LawyerRatingz.com

Find, rate and review Lawyers and Attorneys



Ruben Hamby lawyer reviews

Add a picture of this lawyer Save this listing Search again
Ruben Hamby
Lawyer
Practice Area:  General Practice
Firm:  Hamby Ruben I
Phone:  (410) 792-4435
Profile updated: 6/18/13    Submit profile update

poor quality
Rating: 1.9 (1-5) based on 5 reviews.

Lawyer Ruben Hamby has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.


The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.

Submit a news article about this lawyer Rate this lawyer

KEY Date

 K 

 n 

 o 

 w 

 l 

 e 

 d 

 g 

 e 

 C 

 o 

 m 

 m 

 u 

 n 

 i 

 c 

 a 

 t 

 i 

 o 

 n 

 T 

 e 

 n 

 a 

 c 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 W 

 o 

 r 

 k 

   

 Q 

 u 

 a 

 l 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 V 

 a 

 l 

 u 

 e 

Comments
 
Click to report rating    11/3/22   1     1     1     1     1   Criminal. Read his reviews. Changed contract after I signed it, took me to court for $5000 more than I agreed to. He will try to postpone every hearing to get more payments out of you. If you happen to read any positive comments or reviews about him, I guarantee he wrote it himself. There is no person that could possibly rate him good. Looks like he may be an affordable lawyer but he will get you in the long run. RID: 262420
Click to report rating    10/6/15   1     1     1     1     1   Worthless. Don't waste your time with this one. Better off with a public defender RID: 160181
Click to report rating    8/21/15   1     1     1     1     1   He isn't a very efficient lawyer spend the extra 500 to get someone who is concerned with getting you justice RID: 158445
Click to report rating    10/3/13   5     5     5     5     5   Reuben Hamby from Savage maryland is a great attorney he explains what has to be done and does it successfully I will never choose an attorney over Mr. Hamby. :) RID: 124564
Click to report rating    6/1/11   3     1     1     1     1   did not defend his client. did not bring client's document evidence to court for the duration of hearing. did not protect client's financial interest. did not ask witnesses questions to reveal evidence. asked questions to block disclosure of evidence. did not have a closing statement. RID: 46485
Rate this lawyer