Shelly 
	Rohr lawyer reviews
	
		
		
	
	      	Practice Area: 
	      
		  		  General Practice
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Firm: 
	      
		  		  Wolf Rohr & Mc Kenzie
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Phone: 
	      
		  		  (651) 222-6341
		  
	  	  
	
	
Profile updated: 8/6/12
	
		   Submit profile update
	
	
	
	
        
        
        
		
        
	 	Rating: 1.3 (1-5)
	 	based on 3 reviews.
        Lawyer Shelly Rohr 
			has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
		 
		
	
	
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
	
Submit a news article about this lawyer
	Rate this lawyer
	
	
		| 
				
					| 
	
Rate this lawyer
| KEY | Date |  | 
    
		
			   C   o   m   m   u   n   i   c   a   t   i   o   n  |  |  |  | 
    
        Comments
	
	 |  |  
    |   | 7/26/22 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Warning: Pass on this one!            Rohr is just another attorney (court actor) that doesn't represent her client's interests in the fraudulant system. She encourages clients to participate in junk reunification therapy which isn't a therapy. It's another part of the fraudulant system and racketeering. She helped the opposing side by not securing support and not doing needed duscovery. Her work product for $350 an hour is no better than a $180 hour attorney. She thinks very highly of her self (red flag) and isn't respectfully of her client's needs. She participates in the fraud of the system and didn't truly care about fighting for what was right for me. Know that the attorneys and judicial officers all belong to the same bar which is a conflict of interest. They work together . |   |  
    |   | 9/2/13 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | Ms. Rohr comes to court completely unprepared. I think her paralegal does all the work and she just glances through it before court hearings. Because of this she makes serious mistakes while speaking. |   |  
    |   | 10/28/12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Shelly Rohr knowingly lied in court. Winning isn't everything. Although lying isn't against the law for lawyers it is against their ethical oath and in the end is a disservice to her clients. |   |  |  |