Judy
Goldstein lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
Divorce / Family Law
Profile updated: 9/4/09
Submit profile update
Rating: 1.1 (1-5)
based on 6 reviews.
Lawyer Judy Goldstein
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
| KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
|
3/7/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
I had hired this attorney to do an unemployment appeal for me. She had stated from the very beginning that I had a good case. To sum it up nicely, Nearly $4000.00 dollars later I recieved a letter from her stating that I had lost the appeal. I would not recommend this attorneys service to anyone.
|
|
|
2/26/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Very poor communication. Office associate is rude and condescending. Did not return calls. Work had to be redone several times.
|
|
|
|
2/3/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Ms Goldstein expressed interest in my nephew's assault case to a colleague of my husband's. My nephew was beaten in the parking lot of a bar in Mokena. When he phoned her office the women who spoke with him were wildly rude and abusive with him. We will probably never know whether or not one of those women were Ms Goldstein because neither of them identified themselves. After hearing this I phoned myself in spite of the fact that I was in ICU hooked up to a heart monitor. I mistakenly thought that perhaps they were disrespectful with my nephew due to his young age however I encountered the EXACT same thing. The woman who answered shouted "what is it you want from us" and when I began explaining she hung up. My husband is a very prominent and successful attorney both locally in the Chicago area as well as nationally. He sets the bar very high for how to behave professionally. The legal community is a small one Ms Goldstein. I can't imagine this is the reputation you want for yourself.
|
|
|
|
3/14/11 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Does not return phone calls. Does not quantify billing statements. Does not properly represent clients interests in chambers. Does not accurately interpret rulings.
|
|
|
|
5/16/10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
IT APPEARS SHE WAS VERY UN PROFECIONAL IN COURT ,IT APPEARS SHE COUNTERDICTED HERS SELF ON THE STAND OFTEN.
|
|
|
|
5/12/10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 year of continuances, communication was limited, still trying to clean up problems that arose 2 years after. The divorce decree was poorly written and she misunderstood what was written and did not give accurate advice.
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|
