| KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
12/27/21 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Les familles sont déjà brisées lorsque le parent aliénant vient le voir. MOLPECERES complète la démolition de la famille sans égard aux enfants. Il n'a pas d'éthique. Méfiez-vous, c'est un hypocrite...
C'EST UN CANCER!!!
|
|
|
|
8/20/20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
RESTE LOIN! Il n'en a rien à foutre de l'enfant. Il se soucie de son compte bancaire. RESTEZ LOIN!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM: 3 negative duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
|
8/30/19 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This lawyer is a WORM....he does not represent the children and their best interests ...he was not supposed to take sides, but HE DID because the parent was paying his fees...he made the other parent look bad to the court as he had sided with that parent’s attorney..He is cancer indeed....now my children will suffer the consequences and won’t be able to have all that they could have had....
|
|
|
|
8/2/19 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
I do not think that Molpeceres has any kids and it shows when he is in court. This attorney does not care at all about the long term well being of the children he represents. He really should not be trusted by the court to represent children. He is very dishonest with the statements he makes in court. He will often conceal critical information to protect the interests of the parent whose interests are aligned with the child he is representing. He does not care at all about the truth. In short, he is what is referred to as a "Scumbag Lawyer". As long as he gets paid, that is all that matters. If he is to be appointed your child's attorney, fight tooth and nail for another choice. Very dangerous and unscrupulous!.
|
|
|
|
1/18/19 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
j ai perdu ma fille gtace a cette homme apres 2 rencontre avec ma fille de 12 ans , alors que je desirais aidé ma fille de mon mieix en exigeant la garde partagée comme tout bon parent mon ex conjointe lui assigne cette homme comme procureur a l enfance . deux rencontres dont une que je me suis rendu ce tre ville pour 15 min total a déterminé qur ma fille avait la capacité a decide avec qui elle peut vivre . en lui fesant dire que je ne m etais jamais occupé d elle . que c etaot seulement sa mère . j ai eu une discution apres avec ma fille avoir recu le courriel pour lui rappeler ce qu un pere fait pour s occupé d elle avant et maintenant la semaine suivante jai recu une courriel de sa part de me faire perdre la chance de voir ma fille si je discute encore de ceci avec elle . aujourd hui ma fille a 17 ans jai vu ma fille depuis ce temps 5 fois en 5 ans depuis que le dossier a ete en faveur de mon ex . cette homme n a aucune notion de ce qu il faut un enfant pour son futur sans coeur
|
|
|
|
6/29/18 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This man does very brief interviews with the children and tries to coerce them to accept his ideas & actually told the courts that the children wanted to see the defendant. Gave a verbal statement, nothing in writing. The children vehemently deny his version. They were denied the request to tell the judge the truth in person. These children are now prepared to testify to anyone who will listen. The oldest asked his mother: Mom, you told me to tell the truth and I did and look what is happening. WHY ? These children are now FORCED to see a person they denounced for beating them, insulting and degrading them and touching them in very inappropriate ways ! Some Justice system we have ! We will find a way in the legal system to make sure that justice is rendered for these children, if not now, the children, who are revolted by what this man has done, will take him to court when they are 18. I just wish we had gone on this site BEFORE we allowed him to become the children's lawyer !
|
|
*
|
5/24/18 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Terrific counselor. I felt very confident in him representing my kids' best interests and he delivered. Couldn't recommend him highly enough.
|
|
|
|
4/19/18 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Ignoble. Participe à empirer la cause. Ne comprends rien à l'aliénation parentale. Aveugle volontaire. Facture du transport, les pauses du midi au plein tarif. Facture trop pour lectures de dossiers non réellement réalisées. Un cancer dans le système judiciaire, pas une solution.
|
|
|
|
9/23/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
9/9/15 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
I will be forever grateful to Me Molpeceres. He was assigned by the court to evaluate my children in a long custody battle with a bitter ex-wife. He met with the children many times and was very professional. In the end he saw right through the deception and was superb in court helping my child finally have access to BOTH parents which is what is truly in their best interest. EXCELLENT attorney.
|
|
|
|
10/23/13 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Me Molpeceres is an amazing lawyer and he is phenomenal with children. He was able to get my son to open up to him when no one else could and at the end of my day, my child's wishes were respected because Me Molpeceres is so wonderful at what he does.
|
|
|
|
4/26/13 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
He met with my child for 15 minutes. During that time he took a phone call and spoke on the phone for 10 minutes to another client, it front of my child. I know this because I could hear the whole conversation from the waiting room. His office does not have a very private set-up and his conduct was disappointing.
|
|
|
|
4/9/13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
the worst kind of lawyer representing "the best interest of the children" when in reality he is destroying the fundamental right of children to love both parents. he does not even take the time to speak to the "estranged parent"; he only is in court to procure his fees. In short, he is the lowest form of the human race.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM: location changed from Montreal, QC to Montréal, QC |
|
|
9/8/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Me. Moilpeceres refused to represent my stepson, claiming he would not make enough money handling his case. The more puzzling of the story is that when he initially met him, he was happy to take the case, although he was aware it was an international custody matter.
|
|
|
|
10/27/08 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Too busy to render a good service !
|
|
|
|
10/26/08 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
Well... The same thing happened to me where Me Molpeceres met my child without my knowledge or a mandate from the court. I did not lose custody of my child as Me Molpeceres' testimony in court did not stand up and was actually discredited by the judge. His theory that every child's whim and desire should be heard and followed is devasting families and the future of our children, who in 2008 still need to be guided by responsible and caring parents (whether they are together or not). His type of intervention is unfortunately very much in demand and bringing him a lot of business, but still very detrimental to our kids' future.
|
|
|
|
6/6/08 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
The previous comment is diffamatory to say the least. Me Molpeceres is a Child Attorney and Family Law Attorney. He is a good man, and sound lawyer - I would leave my children with him anyday. Obviously, the previous comment is from someone who lost custody after their children mandated Me Molpeceres to defend their interests... what a ridiculous thing to say.
|
|
|
|
6/6/08 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This lawyer, who specializes in child custodies and divorce litigations, is the most dangerous of lawyers. He sometimes meets children without a mandate at his downtown office in Montreal. Need I say more?
|
|
