LawyerRatingz.com

Find, rate and review Lawyers and Attorneys



Kevin Kaczmara lawyer reviews

Add a picture of this lawyer Save this listing Search again
Kevin Kaczmara
Lawyer
Practice Area:  Criminal Defense
Profile updated: 2/9/22    Submit profile update

good quality
Rating: 5.0 (1-5) based on 3 reviews.

Lawyer Kevin Kaczmara has an excellent overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.


The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.

Submit a news article about this lawyer Rate this lawyer

KEY Date

 K 

 n 

 o 

 w 

 l 

 e 

 d 

 g 

 e 

 C 

 o 

 m 

 m 

 u 

 n 

 i 

 c 

 a 

 t 

 i 

 o 

 n 

 T 

 e 

 n 

 a 

 c 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 W 

 o 

 r 

 k 

   

 Q 

 u 

 a 

 l 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 V 

 a 

 l 

 u 

 e 

Comments
 
Click to report rating    9/16/24   5     5     5     5     5   Highly recommend Kevin is an outstanding, intelligent and dedicated lawyer cabt express how much respect and appreciation I have for him and his entire firm RID: 270740
Click to report rating    3/17/23   5     5     5     5     5   Kevin has represented me on several matters that all resolved with no convictions. He is an outstanding lawyer who goes above and beyond for his clients. This is the lawyer you need. RID: 264485
Click to report rating    1/25/23   5     5     5     5     5   I highly recommend Kevin Kaczmara if you are facing any criminal charges. Mr. Kaczmara totally exceeded my expectations based on my experience with other lawyers. He is extremely diligent, articulate and detail oriented. I was facing 9 violent charge and by the end of the trial was ACQUITTED of ALL charges. No criminal record, no probation, no conditions. Mr. Kaczmara strategically dismantled the plaintiff’s credibility and by closing arguments pointed out about 7-9 inconsistencies with the plaintiff’s thus yielding the plaintiff a “dangerous witness”. And as Mr. Kaczmara told me, it doesn’t even matter if the judge believes I’m guilty, she has no option to acquit based on the inconsistencies of the plaintiff. Whether you did it or not, is secondary to what you can argue - all he needed was reasonable doubt. And he created that uncertainty with a dynamic cross examination with questions totally unforeseen to the plaintiff. Im 100% pleased with his service! RID: 263720
Rate this lawyer