Lea 
	Bickerton lawyer reviews
	
		
		
	
	      	Practice Area: 
	      
		  		  Criminal Defense
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Firm: 
	      
		  		  Bickerton & Bickerton
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Phone: 
	      
		  		  4123935507
		  
	  	  
	
	
Profile updated: 1/7/19
	
		   Submit profile update
	
	
	
	
        
        
        
		
        
	 	Rating: 1.0 (1-5)
	 	based on 2 reviews.
        Lawyer Lea Bickerton 
			has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
		 
		
	
	
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
	
Submit a news article about this lawyer
	Rate this lawyer
	
	
		| 
				
					| 
	
Rate this lawyer
| KEY | Date |  | 
    
		
			   C   o   m   m   u   n   i   c   a   t   i   o   n  |  |  |  | 
    
        Comments
	
	 |  |  
    |   | 1/25/19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Put no work at all into my case once she took me on as a client. Lost a case to where there was no evidence at all. Never did any kind of investigation on my case. Had evidence provided by me deeming the witnesses not credible.I did all the work she did nothing and got paid. Her legal game planning was the worst I ever seen and her cross examination skills were just as bad. I seen someone so inadequate at her craft it had me thinking anyone can pass the bar exam. I was better off hiring a Wal Mart greeter to do the job. Her skills are equivalent to what Oscar the Grouch lives in. Never pay a lawyer multiple times to do a job right the first time. This attorney clearly didn't have a clue to what the term effective means. |   |  
    |   *
 | 1/7/19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Once I hired her it took over a year for my case to go to court waiting for a decision that could have been expedited. Only time she would respond if it pertained to money. Didn't use any witnesses that were in place had an affidavit signed by strong witness and didn't use it. All she did was refute and did a case brief not even tried to prove the intent in court. Had solid information on the staff members involved deeming them not credible did not use it. Cross examination skills were very limited. Throughout and before we even went to court kept saying she could win on appeal. Had information and key witnesses to win at that stage. The prosecution had no evidence at all to present just testimony from people that weren't credible and the investigator admitted he didn't do an investigation only testimony. Lost a case to where there was no evidence only testimony. Only refuted in court and did a case brief. Never could get in contact with her only pertaining to money. Very ineffective! |   |  |  |