Sharon
Crooks lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
Divorce / Family Law
Profile updated: 6/15/14
Submit profile update
Rating: 1.8 (1-5)
based on 5 reviews.
Lawyer Sharon Crooks
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
9/4/20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Nice to see Sharon trying to rate herself now. The review under this one, is straight from the law firm website,cut and pasted word for word. Sharon is a racist, ableist, pile of trash of a lawyer. She will laugh at adult victims of child abuse or claim they are making it up. I've heard her make racist remarks about a native mother. She is a disgusting person who needs to have her licence to practice removed.
|
|
|
8/29/19 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Sharon Crooks did an amazing job for us. Her professionalism and intelligence in and out of the court room are second to none. She fought for us and for what was right and never gave up. With her determination I would hate to be on the opposite side. I would highly recommend Sharon and her team to anyone.
|
|
|
5/25/18 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
The most evil woman i've ever met, the Cruella DeVille hair she sports is quite fitting. She tries to cheat the system at every turn, she isn't a good enough lawyer to win cases the legal way. She is arogant and snotty in the courtroom and doesn't display any professionalism even towards the judges. She constantly coerces the witnesses to get an answer she wants. She knowlying swears to false information, which is why she is under investigation by the law society. She destroys families and childrens lives. If you want to see evil take on a human form look no further than Ms. Sharon Crooks.
|
|
|
2/7/17 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This women is a sad excuse for a lawyer. I hope she has fun with the fact that the supreme court of Canada is now investigating her. This is what happens when you violate Canadian Citizens rights and they report you to the proper authorities.
|
|
|
6/15/14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Considering she is in family law and it states they work in the best interest of the children. She falls way under where you can not imagine. She was the opposing lawyer and supported her client in denying access to the father. She is in it only for the money for herself and her client. In this case the money was not an issue for the father - access was. The councillor that was ordered from her/client for all to see also recommended access and a divorce immediatly. The response was that she was no longer needed until other issues were addressed. So no access/ just money. If you don't care about your children than she will probably work for you. But in the best interest of the children - NOT at all.!With this being said, her client will probably rate her differently. My rating is based on the best interest of the children!!
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|