John
Grover lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
Divorce / Family Law
Firm:
Grover John H
Phone:
+1 250-372-5542
Profile updated: 8/5/13
Submit profile update
Rating: 2.0 (1-5)
based on 5 reviews.
Lawyer John Grover
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
| KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
2/17/17 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Was able to help me win on two separate accounts. Would recommend.
|
|
|
|
9/3/16 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
He likes useless 4 way meetings. Lever any time to speak with a client. Very slow in returning calls.Always in a rush.After 18 months of spinning the wheels and $36000.00 for nothing we changed council.
|
|
|
|
11/11/15 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Not a good reputation. I was told he did not do a good job from someone that dealt with him in the past and I believe that to be the case again.
|
|
|
|
10/20/15 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
If you want to meet a nice guy and spend a lot of money with minimal results this is your guy. If you are willing to spend a lot of time in money thinking this lawyer has a strategy to settle a difficult divorce think again. He can generate letters, follow process but as far as getting the job done he falls short. One thing he is good at is generating bills to pay. I think I should have looked for someone else
|
|
|
|
7/19/13 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
knowledge: Twice as knowledgable as the first lawyer from this firm. communication: met him for 5 minutes before a supreme court hearing for the first time. tenacity: just about tripped over himself to congratulate opposing council on how good a job they did. work quality: couldn't take the time to drop a dime on me to discuss our plan of action for a supreme court hearing. value: did manage to get a reduction in alimony payment that the previous lawyer took several years for a less than realistic result. I honestly believe I could have received a better result representing myself. doesn't want to meet to discuss the bill.
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|
