Patti C.
Ratekin lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
General Practice
Profile updated: 1/8/20
Submit profile update
Rating: 1.0 (1-5)
based on 6 reviews.
Lawyer Patti C. Ratekin
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
| KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
1/20/22 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Great News! Commissioner Patti Ratekin retired. I called the San Diego court to file a grievance against her (my recent case was January 11, 2022) and the court informed me that she retired (I was hoping she was fired!) This evil person will no longer preside over cases. She oversaw my marriage dissolution and money judgement for five years and frankly, I'm elated that I no longer have to deal with her unprofessionalism and rude behavior. All the commentary that I've read, I also witnessed, first hand. The irony to her miserable career is that she never understood that she was a public servant, appointed to serve "the people". I pray that in her retirement that her heart will be changed towards people and God have mercy on her soul. From all the reviews from this website and countless others, she ruined families!
|
|
|
|
7/30/20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
I have never met a more biased, ignorant and offensive attorney or Judge. -and that’s saying something
|
|
|
|
2/7/20 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This Commissioner needs to be admonished for the way she treats women. She refuses to hear the case in full or the facts at hand. No wonder she is not a Judge. I pray she is taken out of the System before she causes the death or severe abuses to a child's psyche due to her decisions to be one sided and with the WRONG parent. I pray one day that someone sits in her Court with the Power to REMOVE HER...…….She has NO VLUES or ETHICS!! BEWARE of her Prejudices.
|
|
|
|
12/29/19 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
She is biased, she prejudge the case before hearing even started. She is stubborn. She made a statement like THIS ONE:" Under no circumstances i will rule that you will get "this" and "that".Another her statement.After i did show that undisputed fact shows that Ms X is lying, she stated:" Ms X is credible because the events took place 16 years priors". So, de facto she admitted that Ms X was forgetting something. Ms. X demonstrated beautiful memory of the events but her testimony was complete lie story which she invented. Ms. X was a lawyer who knew Commissioner for many years. I am appealing her decision now. But she called me not credible without any reason many times because the Appeal Court cannot change her decision at this issue. At least , she is smart here. ASKED TO CHANGED HER TO THE JUDGE BEFORE YOUR CASE STARTED!
|
|
|
|
3/11/19 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Im a Grandma who reported to CPS the pictures & bruises on my Grandson on the demands of my sons Lawyer. If fact, he wouldn't take the case if I didnt report and I have that request from him in writing. I never told them I accuse the mother even once of doing anything. I didnt know who was doing it. Well, at court, the mother told Ratekin I was being vindictive and without me saying a word she said couldn't see my Grandson.My son & Grandson were living with ME. I had to move out of my house. Then she said both my son and the mother had to agree for me to see the baby. What? The mother wasnt going to do that. Miss Ratekin, Passed judgment on ME when I wasnt part of the case & wasnt even allowed to defend myself. Both CPS & Drs found my Grandson was abused but didnt have proof of who did it. This is why people dont report abuse! I haven't seen my Grandson in months. What "judge" pulls families apart, instead of bringing them together. Look at her reviews? Shes destroyed families
|
|
|
|
4/6/18 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Unprofessional. Showed up to conference without reading both client's statements; made a miscategorization in mind, and proceeded by being ill-informed, rude, condescending, and aggressive. What judgement to appreciate in fairness, clarity, and knowledge from this commissioner, when she has not read both parties' statements to begin with? It's a shame. Someone else of better qualities befitting of sitting on the chair of a judge, is what magnificent San Diego deserves.
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|
