Richard C. 
	Lam lawyer reviews
	
		
		
	
	      	Practice Area: 
	      
		  		  General Practice
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Firm: 
	      
		  		  Law Offices of Richard Lam
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Website: 
	      
	  	  		  getawillandatrust.com  Phone:
	  	  
	  	  
	
	      	Phone: 
	      
		  		  (925) 938-9030
		  
	  	  
	
	
Profile updated: 4/27/13
	
		   Submit profile update
	
	
	
	
        
        
        
		
        
	 	Rating: 1.0 (1-5)
	 	based on 1 reviews.
        Lawyer Richard C. Lam 
			has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
		 
		
	
	
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
	
Submit a news article about this lawyer
	Rate this lawyer
	
	
		| 
				
					| 
	
Rate this lawyer
| KEY | Date |  | 
    
		
			   C   o   m   m   u   n   i   c   a   t   i   o   n  |  |  |  | 
    
        Comments
	
	 |  |  
    |   | 8/17/16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | TRANSIENTS MOVED INTO MY PPTY. I WAS EVICTING AND I WAS ASSAULTED.I WENT TO THE D.A. TO HELP ME REMOVE THEM. THIS ALERTED THE CITY OF POMONA OF THE PROBLEM I WAS IN THE PROCESS OF EVICTING AND SOLD THE PPTY.TO A BUYER WHO BUYS DISTRESSED INDUSTRIAL PPTIES.  NOT TO DEAL WITH THE TRANSIENTS. THE CITY'S ATTY. RICHARD LAM SENT ME ONE NOTICE TO REMOVE THE TRANSIENTS AND THEIR DEBRIS OR A RECEIVER WOULD BE APPOINTED. I TOOK HIM THE DOCUMENTS THAT I WAS IN THE PROCESS OF DOING IT. HIS STAFF DID NOT THINK HE WOULD HONESTLY FILE FOR A RECEIVER SINCE I WAS ALREADY RESOLVING THE ISSUES. HE SAID & I EVEN HAVE HIS HANDWRITTEN COMMENTS HE WOULD NOT APPOINT A RECEIVER AND HE STILL DID IT. HE NEVER SERVED ME THE 8 REQUIRED NOTICES. I TOLD THE COURT AND HE  IGNORED IT  THE JUDGE DOES  NOT EVEN APPEAR IN THE COURTROOM. I THEN FILED FOR A HEARING TO AGAIN GIVE THE FACT I HAD NOT BEEN SERVED THE REQUIRED  8 NOTICES & IT WAS DENIED. THE RECEIVER HE APPOINTED HAS DEPRECIATED THE PPTY. STOLEN VALUABLE PPTY.A |   |  |  |