George 
	Flumian lawyer reviews
	
		
		
	
	      	Practice Area: 
	      
		  		  Real Estate
		  
	  	  
	
	      	
Firm: 
	      
		  		  Flumian Associates / Flumian Law
		  
	  	  
	
	
Profile updated: 6/20/11
	
		   Submit profile update
	
	
	
	
        
        
        
		
        
	 	Rating: 2.5 (1-5)
	 	based on 3 reviews.
        Lawyer George Flumian 
			has a fair overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
		 
		
	
	
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
	
Submit a news article about this lawyer
	Rate this lawyer
	
	
		| 
				
					| 
	
Rate this lawyer
| KEY | Date |  | 
    
		
			   C   o   m   m   u   n   i   c   a   t   i   o   n  |  |  |  | 
    
        Comments
	
	 |  |  
    |   | 9/24/15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | The discipline hearing against Mr. Flumian proceeded on Wednesday, September 16, 2015.  He signed an Agreed Statement of Facts and admitted all the allegations of professional misconduct, which alleviated the necessity of calling witnesses to testify.The Tribunal made an order giving him permission to surrender his license to practice law by September 30, 2015, failing which his license will be revoked. |   |  
    |   | 11/3/14 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | willing to help with any matter discussed also  is  available  with easy access to office and location in ottawa |   |  
    |   | 6/20/11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | George Flumian (1982) of the City of Ottawa, was found guilty of professional misconduct for: failing to serve 4 clients in a conscientious, diligent and efficient manner in relation to 2 real estate sales transactions; failing to promptly account for clients' funds to 4 clients; failing to maintain the books and records of his practice; and failing to fulfill his personal undertakings in a timely manner, or at all, given to 3 fellow solicitors.
By Decision and Order dated January 17, 2006, the Hearing Panel ordered that: the Member's rights and privileges are suspended for 1 month commencing February 1, 2006 and concluding February 28, 2006; the Member shall pay costs in the amount of $1,500.00 by February 28, 2006.  His tactic is to delay "in trust" payment using the guise that he is negotiating and providing service in the client's best interest.  Payment is made to those who persist. |   |  |  |