KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
4/12/21 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Ms. Pringle and Mr. Szaefer are excellent counsel for family law. This practice has consistently proven that they work diligently and collaboratively for their clients. I would highly recommend either lawyer for custody and access issues, child and spousal support, property division and separation agreements as well as cohabitation and/or marriage contracts. 10/10!
|
|
|
2/20/20 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Got the job done and made sure I left happy. Was compassionate and made the process as easy as it could be. I would recommend Nancy to anyone.
|
|
|
10/18/18 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
A follow up from 10/08/15 review. This lawyer was investigated by the Law Society for 12 months. The result was a reprimand with letter in her File with Law Societynsnd a warning for misconduct to not repeat. Evidence found of creating further conflict in an already high conflict case and “adding fuel to the fire” among many other elements of misconduct. Steer clear.
|
|
|
5/23/18 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
She rep'd my ex. I asked for custody, child support, and wanted to gradually increase visitation b/c our child was nursing. She sent back 30 pages of lies, made things more contentious, and dragged things out for a year before dropping him as a client. She basically wasted our time & his money, made things more hostile, & got an interim order that was against the best interest of a breastfed baby by submitting lies to the court. His next lawyer helped us come to an agreement and we settled things within 2 months. She's knowledgeable and tenacious, but don't use her unless your only interest is to pay her to attack your ex and you don't care about your child's best interest.
|
|
|
5/30/17 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
SHE DOES "NOT" HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE THE CANADIAN LAW PERTAINING TO A SPOUSE'S RIGHT TO 50% OF THE EQUITY IN A MATTRIMONIAL HOME!
|
|
|
11/8/16 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
has a large caseload. Her staff are amazing considering the stress and workload. Sometimes things don't work in your favour, it is NOT because of the office, but that everyone is entitled and has limited knowledge of law. Would recommend.
|
|
|
6/15/16 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Cooky Cutter Law and she will forget about you the moment you leave her space. Take a thursday afternoon and go up to the courthouse to watch her work and her submissions, you will get it quickly. She will cost you tens of thousands and several years. A master at dragging it out, for forever. You have a lot to lose by agreeing with her tactics. If you want to be labelled a liar that will say anything in court to get your way, she is your girl. Great way to lose your kid's respect after the fact once they find out what you went along with.
|
|
|
5/24/16 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Nothing more than a child predator and human tafficker. Uses FRO as her personal collection agency to force bonded labor. Makes lawyer contributions to judges to sway opinions. Bills clients for illegal activity. A disgrace to CBAR.
|
|
|
12/21/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
10/18/15 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This lawyer represented my opposition. This lawyer is currently under investigation by the law society for professional misconduct, as of October 16, 2015. If you have real concerns about your experience with this lawyer fill out a formal complaint form from the law society website and send it in. Real efforts gets real results. This lawyer did not respond to me, she did not address the issues or my concerns, she put her client on a payment plan to try and exhaust my funds but I represented myself and her client was stuck with a bill I estimate was over $100,000.00 and the results were not in interest of her client.
|
|
|
10/8/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
While at work a maintenance guy asked me how my visit with Nancy went. I never ever spoke about my visit with a lawyer with this man. He then proceeded to tell me that it was too bad I did not have a lot of equity in the house that I walked away from. He said his wife works for Nancy so everything she tells him will remain confidential. I am so upset that a co-worker knows my personal business.
|
|
|
4/29/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Communication is terrible. Nancy does not explain herself; she does not setup a plan of action. I felt like I was only being represented by her for the money; not working with her client. I tried to address my concerns with her and received no compassion. Biggest mistake I have ever made.
|
|
*
|
3/13/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
10/8/14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
I WENT TO SEE HER A FEW MTHS BACK. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A FREE CONSULTATION. SHE WROTE 1 LETTER FOR ME AND I SPOKE TO HER ONCE ON THE PHONE. DUE TO HER RETAINER BEING WAY TOO HIGH, I DID NOT GET HER TO REPRESENT ME. NOW HER OFFICE CALLED ME TODAY TO TELL ME THAT THEY ARE SENDING ME A BILL FOR HER SERVICES. I ASKED WHAT SERVICES BESIDES THE LETTER AND THE 5 MIN CONVERSATION ON THE PHONE WITH HER TWICE. THEY ARE TELLING ME THAT SHE DID A LOT OF WORK FOR ME AND THAT I SPOKE TO HER SEVERAL TIMES. THAT'S A LIE. SHE IS ONLY INTERESTED IN MONEY AND THAT IS WHY I NEVER RETAINED HER. WHAT SHE CAN MAKE OFF OF YOU IS HER BOTTOM LINE. I WOULD NEVER USE HER. NEVER GO TO A LAWYER THAT ADVERTISES A FREE CONSULT BECAUSE THAT ISN'T WHAT IT TURNS OUT TO BE. SHE SUCKS!!!
|
|
|
5/1/14 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
Was only really interested in my money and my bill. She showed compassion but when it really came down to it her compassion was motivated by money. Her staff have no personality and make you feel inadequate and look down their nose at you. She is your proto typical Lawyer, your money is what matters only. I do not recommend her at all.
|
|
|
3/6/14 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
Nancy dragged me through 4 years making all kinds of promises costing me almost 30k. She doesn't return calls and I had to hound her. Her staff is rude. I would take time off of work and lose pay to sit and wait for her and have to tell her the same things over and over. She cares about lining her own pockets despite what she tells you. Run far from Nancy and find another lawyer. She will burn you dry
|
|
|
8/13/13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
If you don't have what to do with your money and you have time to waist!! Then you Found The Perfect LAWYER. She is the perfect lawyer for taking your money and wasting your time through courts
|
|
|
12/17/12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
By far the best lawyer in Sarnia. Got the job done, her office staff is impeccable as well as her and her work. She is extremely professional and hard working. I would recommend her to anyone, all those negative comments are extremely off and do not represent her well at all. Those are all wrong and do not say anything that is true. Nancy is and will always be the best lawyer in sarnia.
|
|
*
|
1/5/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
She totally failed my friend. Lost her a LOT of money - did NOT represent her well. Office NEVER NEVER BUT NEVER returns calls. Quick to send her bills though. DO NOT USE NANCY PRINGLE
|
|
|
11/15/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
I told her exactly what I wanted. I got exactly what I wanted. She did what I paid her to do.
|
|
|
10/15/11 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
She is working hard for me, I like her and recommend her. My case is ongoing so this may change.
|
|
|
9/28/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Never had alot of ongoing contact with her office, but when required was timely and efficient. When we would meet, Nancy didn't rush and seemed genuinely concerned about my issues. She's no nonsense and gives straight up advice. No BS, didn't drag out my case forever. I liked her.
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM: 2 negative duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
8/13/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
she would not refused to talk things out with my lawyer for 8 months now that I lost my lawyer she taking me to court asking for more money then she asked for when I made twice as much.and trying to make that I cant see the children. If she what shes asking for I will loose my apartment.
|
|
|
6/20/11 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Incorrect paperwork lack of phone call backs, does not seem interested in resolving cases without going to court. Lack of advise does not accept emails
|
|
|
4/18/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
lack of communication...does not return calls...does not walk the talk...will not get anything done...will drag it out ...only interested in the money...basicly two faced...would not recommend her
|
|
|
4/11/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Does not listen to client no advice given just numerous letters between lawyers. staff call backs are lacking.
|
|
|
4/4/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Nancy and her staff will never return your calls, sends your correspondence to wrong address, you do most of the work but she will tell you what you want to her that you will get what you are entitled to. She is a bully and doesn't have a lot of patience if you don't do what she wants you to do. I wouldn't recommend her unless you want a sweet talker who will take your money and drag things out.
|
|