Daniel
Caisse lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
General Practice
Firm:
Caisse Daniel
Phone:
+1 514-288-2250
Profile updated: 8/6/12
Submit profile update
Rating: 1.4 (1-5)
based on 1 reviews.
Lawyer Daniel Caisse
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
5/24/17 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
He was not prepared,he dont know well the laws relating to my situation, I have to finish the file alone because he no longer made follow up, very expensive for what he made for me.
|
|
|
2/8/16 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Me Caisse's team is extremely knowledgable and handled my case very efficiently. As a single mother who was left with a house full of hidden defects, I was extremely pleased they managed to recooperate the necessary money from the opposing party to cover the repairs. I highly recommend this team.
|
|
|
9/8/15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This layer has no ethics. Do not use him for any real estate transaction. He is in bed with the banks. Does not have the clients best interest at heart.
|
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM: location changed from Montreal, QC to Montréal, QC |
|
4/29/10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This lawyer took a $30,000 retainer fee in a six-month period and also billed at an hourly rate of $225 plus taxes. He had us cornered seeing our desperate need for a lawyer. After he stuffed his lardy face with our hard earned monies, he was instrumental in jinxing a then 12-year case and had printed on a Montreal newspaper that the plaintiffs would never get damages and interest that an Appeals' Court Judgement had awarded in 1999 -if the case may be. Anyhow, a fatal Award was appealed. Two of the plaintiffs have had to self represent themselves in the highest tribunal in Quebec and won. Appeals' Court #500 09 016637 068. It is no use erasing the above Me Caisse, I'll keep on printing till Justice is served. Yes, a complaint was filed with the Barreau. Result: it was shoved under the rug like all the other numerous complaint filed during a now 17-year case. It is the naked Truth.
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|