LawyerRatingz.com

Find, rate and review Lawyers and Attorneys



Brian Shulman lawyer reviews

Add a picture of this lawyer Save this listing Search again
Brian Shulman
Lawyer
Practice Area:  Criminal Defense
Firm:  Shulman Brian J
Phone:  (585) 454-4750
Profile updated: 8/14/12    Submit profile update

good quality
Rating: 4.0 (1-5) based on 4 reviews.

Lawyer Brian Shulman has a good overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.


The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.

Submit a news article about this lawyer Rate this lawyer

KEY Date

 K 

 n 

 o 

 w 

 l 

 e 

 d 

 g 

 e 

 C 

 o 

 m 

 m 

 u 

 n 

 i 

 c 

 a 

 t 

 i 

 o 

 n 

 T 

 e 

 n 

 a 

 c 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 W 

 o 

 r 

 k 

   

 Q 

 u 

 a 

 l 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 V 

 a 

 l 

 u 

 e 

Comments
 
Click to report rating    7/25/15   5     3     5     5     5   Good guy only meets be for court but did his job on a real easy felony case got it droped RID: 157201
Click to report rating    10/19/12   5     5     5     5     5   He is a great lawyer. He not only won my divorce case but he married my ex-wife. What a guy RID: 93438
Click to report rating    7/6/11   5     5     5     5     5   Mr. Shulman got me out of a ton of trouble. I screwed up majorly and almost lost not only my driver's license but also my professional license. Mr. Shulman was very easy to talk to, sympathetic to my situation, and went above and beyond to help me. Thanks to him my life has not been ruined by a stupid mistake that I made. I highly recommend him as a criminal defense attorney! RID: 48066
Click to report rating    1/28/10   2     1     1     2     1   Mr. Shulman was court appointed. He usually met only 5 or 10 minutes before court dates. He missed one date because he was on vacation. He did not answer letters, did not call character witnesses. He was only interested in having his client take a plea, even though he was not guilty, and never once admitted guilt. During the trial, he did nothing to object to the prosecutor's emotional language which was intended to sway the jury. He called no expert witnesses to reply to witnesses for the prosecution. He did not have proper certified copies of checks, and so could not admit them into evidence. RID: 26661
Rate this lawyer