LawyerRatingz.com

Find, rate and review Lawyers and Attorneys



Cedric Nahum lawyer reviews

Add a picture of this lawyer Save this listing Search again
Cedric Nahum
Lawyer
Practice Area:  Divorce / Family Law
Firm:  Kimberly Pegg
Profile updated: 12/14/09    Submit profile update

average quality
Rating: 3.0 (1-5) based on 4 reviews.

Lawyer Cedric Nahum has a fair overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.


The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.

Submit a news article about this lawyer Rate this lawyer

KEY Date

 K 

 n 

 o 

 w 

 l 

 e 

 d 

 g 

 e 

 C 

 o 

 m 

 m 

 u 

 n 

 i 

 c 

 a 

 t 

 i 

 o 

 n 

 T 

 e 

 n 

 a 

 c 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 W 

 o 

 r 

 k 

   

 Q 

 u 

 a 

 l 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 V 

 a 

 l 

 u 

 e 

Comments
 
Click to report rating    11/30/17   1     1     1     1     1   Cedric was very unprofessional, unfriendly, unprepared, tardy and not at all an advocate. I would suggest that you look elsewhere for a lawyer if you want someone who will fight for you. RID: 193486
Click to report rating    8/11/17   5     4     3     5     5   Best lawyer I have ever had. Got me a diversion and didn't gouge me for his services. RID: 188847
Click to report rating    6/28/16   5     5     5     5     5   Cedric has worked very hard for me over the past couple years from criminal law to family law. He helped me to get my son back and got me atleast 10 diversions and to this day I do not have a criminal record thanks to Cedric. He is amazing and has helped me so much over my rough time in life. He answers me right away and works hard to help me and my son to be reunited. I would definetly recommend him to anyone and from charges like assault with a weapon to fraud , etc he has gotten me off of and discharged. Hes great, very easy to talk to and fights for your rights. Couldn't ask for a better outcome. RID: 171113
Click to report rating    11/20/14   2     2     1     1     1   Hard to believe this man can make a living at law. As a friendly witness, I could have helped his case considerably, all he had to do was ask the right questions. He knew which questions to ask, but didn't do it. Instead, he chose to focus on an irrelevant point. Don't know what he thought he was doing, but I'm certain it did not help his main case at all. So why was I there? RID: 146512
Rate this lawyer