Robert
Brennan lawyer reviews
Practice Area:
Divorce / Family Law
Profile updated: 1/19/09
Submit profile update
Rating: 1.0 (1-5)
based on 1 reviews.
Lawyer Robert Brennan
has a poor overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.
The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.
Submit a news article about this lawyer
Rate this lawyer
KEY |
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
Comments
|
|
|
10/9/09 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
of course they going to complain about their money,how he could preform and finish his job when he got suspended?Its all bs that some one trying to pull,admit there is nothing there,nice try,but he still best lawyer of all time.
|
|
|
9/3/09 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
The state Supreme Court’s disciplinary counsel has filed more ethics complaints against veteran Cranston lawyer Robert M. Brennan, who was suspended from practice in December 2008 pending further investigation into the disappearance of tens of thousands of dollars in clients’ funds.
The new charges involve seven of Brennan’s former clients who filed complaints with the court’s chief disciplinary counsel
|
|
|
7/5/09 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
unethical behavior "The Supreme Court also meted out an indefinite suspension to lawyer Robert M. Brennan, who practiced out of an office at 75 Sockanosset Cross Rd. in Cranston. Brennan also did not contest the suspension. Curtin’s office is still investigating the disappearance of $65,731.16 in client funds. "
|
|
|
3/3/09 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
yes he knows what he doing and one of the best,aggressive and expierenced over 35 years in practice.
|
|
|
2/25/09 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
one of the best attorney in state.Im sad for what he going through.I hope he will come back.He is very honest and honorable man A++++
|
|
|
1/23/09 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
He knows what he is doing but he will take all of your money.
|
|
|
1/19/09 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Mr Brennan was recently suspended based on allegations that he converted client funds to his own use. According to newspaper accounts Mr Brennan was asked if he converted cleints funds to his own use and “he refused to answer those questions, asserting his right against self-incrimination…”
|
|
Rate this lawyer
|
|