|
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Smart Great knowledge of law, keeps client informed, great communication. i would use him again. he did a great job on my case. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
12/8/10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Great lawyer extremly smart,great communication, service, gives 100+% to case, trustworthly strongly recommended to anyone |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
1/29/09 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
He quotes a rate, the adds up new charges, phone calls ect.he makes, and if you don't pay these extra fee's you he drops you.He will not refund any of the fee's you have already paid, even though it's in the thousands. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
6/3/08 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
He charges you if you call his office and he has to read a memo you called. He keeps adding charges and adding. He did not represent me as he stated. I felt he sold me out to the opposing attorney. I had to hire another attorney to try to clean up the mess he left me in. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
2/4/08 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
This lawyer proved to be incompetant in all aspects of my Civil Trial and I would not recommend him to anyone. He does not perform the duties he is assigned and is protected by his daddy who happens to be a judge in the same judicial system. His billing practices are less than honest. He billed me for walking up to a locked door at a library that he was going to anyway. He also billed me for talking about things not relevant to my case. He will call and leave you message after message just so he can bill you for those messages left. He will not return your calls so he can bill you for the messages you leave while trying to contact him. He showed lack of knowledge of judicial proceedings by not telling me the Judge could forbid the jury to rule on my case. He did not tell me my oponents attorney used to practice law with the judge in my case which was grounds for recusal. Overall in my opinion Larry Hill is incompetant |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|