|
![[Key]](/local/images/key_blue_header.gif)
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4/3/13 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Howard worked on a corporate case for me and handled by angry employee for me. After his great work on the case, I retained him to advise my business going forward. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
9/25/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Would NEVER use Howard again. Communication was zip. I assume someone has his attention, but it wasn't me. If I didn't stay on him my case would have missed many deadlines. Do yourself a favor. Find someone else. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
5/16/12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
I thought Mr. Howard Van Den Heuvel went above and beyond my case. He is a very determined lawyer who sees the situation through to the end. I am most happy with the outcome of my case. Howard is very personable and I recommend him to any person - Howard is really knowledgeable when it comes to legal matters! |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
10/23/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
The bar association referred me to Mr. Van den heuvel. I was told the initial meeting would cost me $20, no one said that was for the first 30 minutes. I was going to hire him and gave a retainer check dated the following day, when service was to start. Within 1-1/2 hrs I called and left a message that I would not in fact need his service. Stopped by his office later (3:30pm) and no one was there so left another message. Called the next day and spoke to him, was told he would hold the check in case I changed my mind. Over a week later I get a call from him telling me I owe him $155 for his time. What? He says the meeting went 34 minutes over the agreed 30 minute time. After I had proof it didn't, he changed his story several times: they set their clocks ahead, oh then it was because he had to set up a file even though in our meeting he said it wouldn't be done until the next day (does it take 34 minutes to set up a file?). In my opinion he is deceitful. Would not recommend him. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
1/7/08 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Very inconsistant with his knowledge about law ("I will have to research that")is his favorate line. Is extremely concerned about his billable minutes. Communication is extremely poor, and does not defend his clients with any type of tenacity. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
10/9/07 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
His only concern is getting paid for the hour. Does not bother about aggressively representing the client and thier views. Spends lot of time talking and discussing the same matter giving you the same view again and again and then billes you for telling you the same thing. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
