|
![[Key]](/local/images/key_blue_header.gif)
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/2/12 |
|
SYSTEM: 2 positive duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
|
8/23/12 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
The last post on this site is an absolute lie and is defamatory. I did not disclose any confidential information ever, do not frequent bars of any sort and do not have any such bars as clients. I would invite this person to do contact the law society to do a proper investigation instead of leaving a post on a rating site: Darryl Aarbo |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
8/6/12 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
contacted Aarbo in 2009 about representing me in a host liablility suit. He decined as it was a gay bar he frequented. What he failed to mention was that the bar was already a client, and that he was going to notify the bar of my contact. No one else was privy to the information the bar confonted me on. Mr Aarbo was the only lawyer I had contacted. Very unethical to say the least. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
10/22/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
Do not understand the bad comments. Maybe the other side not happy that he did a good job. Worked very hard on the case. Very tenatious. Got expensive but I suppose the same with all lawyers. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
10/20/11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Not recommended, he doesn't care about you case. didn't contact or inform about case. didn't respond to email or fax. in the court just wait and do nothing |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
7/30/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Very good lawyer Pleasant staff. Good location. Loved seeing the dog in the office. Good experience. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
7/22/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
I thought he was a great lawyer. Very responsive. Very aggressive. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
7/21/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Great lawyer, reasonable rates. Always got back to me on time. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
1/31/11 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
Not very thorough. Didn't know the file, doesn't listen, misses detail, aloof and arrogant. Not recommended. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
