TALASKE IGNORED THE DISCREPANCIES IN THE TRIAL BRIEFS DURING MY DIVORCE HEARING. HE INSISTED THAT I ACCEPT AN UNFAIR & RIDICULOUSLY LOW SETTLEMENT WITH THE THREAT (!) THAT MY CASE COULD BE EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE IF I DID NOT AGREE. AS A RESULT, I WAS FORCED TO ACCEPT AN UNFAIR DIVISION OF PROPERTY AFTER 44 YEARS OF MARRIAGE. I BELIEVED MICHIGAN TO BE AN "EQUITABLE STATE". IT IS OBVIOUS THAT "JUSTICE" IS WHATEVER YOU CAN AFFORD TO PAY.