|
![[Key]](/local/images/key_blue_header.gif)
Date |
|
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/22/11 |
|
SYSTEM: 2 positive duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
|
4/19/11 |
|
SYSTEM: 2 negative duplicate or disallowed ratings automatically removed |
|
|
1/14/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
I too was a victim in which Mr. Pearson was assigned the case. He was professional and sympathetic and I have nothing but respect for him and his work. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
1/13/11 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Mr. Pearson is a great attorney who always has the citizens best interest at heart. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
8/27/10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Highly unprofessional. Uses tactics that are highly unethical in how he handles cases and represents the County Prosecutors Office. His boss Mark Heideman has been informed of numerous unethical actions of Pearson, only to cover them up and allow the continual violations of the law. Has been invested previously by the Bar. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
7/9/10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
|
|
5/11/10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Pearson is a very arrogant Deputy Prosecutor. He has been involved in less than appropriate conduct and complaints have been filed against him. Local attorneys have repeatedly indicate that he does not work towards solutions only for the benefit of placing Pearson in front of the local news media. He needs to return to law school and learn some basic training about solutions rather than creating conflicts. |
|
|
Registered users can respond publicly to this rating
|
