Historical Perspective - Lawyers are repulsive S C U M

Main Forum

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Tue Nov 15, 2011 12:21 am

Disbarred Kentucky Attorney Bruce Atherton
Accused of Offering Illegal Debt Relief Services by Attorney General.


Atherton was sentenced on July 15, 2010 to 10 months in prison and ordered to repay $472,720 from federal criminal charges for mail and wire fraud. He was also indicted on criminal charges in New Jersey for financial facilitation of criminal activity, theft by deception and conspiracy.

His lawyer also said in a sentencing memorandum that Atherton is an alcoholic and that his “professional and personal life has suffered the effects of alcohol abuse which began in 2000.”

The Kentucky Bar Association suspended his law license in September 2009.


This isn't the first time a lawyer has used "my (lawyer) client is a raging drunk" defense.
Although it would impress most as a bizarre excuse to escape culpability, forked tongue lawyers realize gullible jurors are easily manipulated..........

It was a defense that drew snickers from lawyers around Lexington. Melbourne Mills Jr., his lawyers argued in his high-profile trial, was too drunk to know what was going on when two other lawyers allegedly pilfered millions of dollars from their clients in a diet-drug lawsuit settlement. Yet Mills ultimately had the last laugh when a jury acquitted him on July 1 on conspiracy to commit wire fraud charges.
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:17 am

9 LEGAL EAGLES DESTINED FOR PRISON CELL


Attempted Capital Murder

In February 2011, Bellaire, Texas, lawyer Jeffrey Mark Stern, 53, became the sixth person to be indicted in an alleged plot to kill his wife, Yvonne Stern, who has so far survived at least three attempts on her life, the last leaving her critically wounded in May 2005. Yvonne Stern had filed for divorce from her husband after the third attempt on her life.


Cold-Blooded Murder

Chicago attorney Fredrick Goings (pictured), 36, was charged in 2009 with the January 24 murders of Nova Henry, 24, former girlfriend of New York Knicks player Eddy Curry, and her ten-month-old daughter, Ava. The coroners determined that both victims died of multiple gunshot wounds.


Strangulation and Attempted Murder

John Michael Farren (left), 57, of New Canaan, Conn., was arrested shortly after 10 p.m. on January 6, 2010, when police received a panic alarm from his home. Farren had allegedly attacked his wife, Mary Farren (right), 43, and a partner at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom with a flashlight.


Identity Theft

In December 2010, attorney Robert Wilkey, 35, of Coatesville, Pa., admitted in court to stealing the identity of an Upper Saucon Township client and using the information to apply for credit cards. Wilkey said he took his client's identity to pay for his gambling habit. Police were able to trace online credit card applications in Orellana's name to Wilkey's work and home computers.


A Shoe-in

Alaskan labor attorney Erin Pohland, 31, was charged in February 2011 with shoplifting shoes from a Fred Meyer store in (shown) on December 30, 2010. According to the complaint, surveillance footage from Fred Meyer showed Pohland and 30-year-old Skye McRoberts loading $1,020.08 worth of shoes into two shopping carts, which they took to the store's hardware section. Pohland then used wire cutters to remove the electronic theft-prevention tags, put back the empty shoe boxes and moved the loot to shopping bags in a single cart which McRoberts pushed out of the store.


Embezzling from Ballet Dancers

Labor lawyer Leonard Leibowitz, 72, was indicted in New York on charges of embezzling money from a union that he founded and ran from 1972 until 2007 for the American Ballet Theatre (ABT dancer pictured). Leibowitz is accused of embezzling over $150,000 over the course of eight years. When confronted by the now-defunct union's leadership about the money, Leibowitz said he needed it to keep his kids in private school.


Dealing Dope

Philadelphia attorney Richard K. Creamer, 38, who practiced real estate and corporate law in Northern Liberties, Pa., purchased a warehouse with James Alberts, a South Philadelphia contractor. They had gone in together on such deals in the past, buying distressed properties and selling them at a profit. According to Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph T. Labrum III, Creamer discovered that Alberts was making thousands of dollars each month by using the building to grow and sell marijuana. Creamer joined Alberts' venture and, according to prosecutors, the two invested $100,000 to renovate the structure to create a high-tech marijuana farm , which from March to June 2009 produced 20 pounds of high-grade cannabis per month.


Extreme Corruption

Senior attorney with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Peter Kallas (pictured), 39, of Alta Loma, Calif. was convicted in April 2010 on federal charges of corruption for taking thousands of dollars in bribes from immigrants seeking documents to remain in the U.S. A jury found Kallas guilty of conspiracy, bribery, obstruction of justice, fraud, misuse of entry documents, aggravated identity theft, making false statements to the Department of Labor, making false statements to obtain federal employee compensation, and, of course, tax evasion.


Racketeering

Top New Jersey criminal defense attorney Paul Bergrin (pictured) was convicted in Manhattan in October 2009 of running a prostitution ring. He apparently didn't start the prostitution ring known as "Rocket Fule for Winners," so much as he took over the business and the pimping when founding pimp Jason Itzler, Bergrin's former client whom he unsuccessfully defended against pimping charges.


Jury Tampering

In August 2009, New York criminal defense attorney Robert Simels (pictured), 62, was convicted of multiple counts of witness-tampering, bribery, and illegal possession of eavesdropping equipment. The charges stemmed from a plot to "eliminate" and "neutralize" federal witnesses slated to testify against one of his clients. Simels was convicted of tampering with eight witnesses set to testify against Shaheed (Roger) Khan, a major cocaine trafficker from Guyana. Simels was sentenced to 14 years in prison.
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:08 pm

Jacksonville lawyer Jay Clifton Halsema has been permanently disbarred from practicing law

The State Attorney's Office said Halsema had worked on the financing paperwork for at least two fraudulent real estate deals worth a total of $1.7 million. He also failed to replace worthless checks given for the purchase of a motorcycle and secured notarization of a Housing and Urban Development document without the presence of his wife, whom he claimed signed the purchase agreement, according to The Florida Bar.

Halsema pleaded guilty to a charge of a scheme to defraud, the Bar said. Duval County jail logs show he spent two months in jail.
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:47 pm

FORGER CERTAINLY DESERVED MORE THAN A REPRIMAND

New Jersey lawyer Donald Bedell Jr. has been reprimanded for forging two clients’ signatures on releases for an unauthorized settlement, appending his own signature as a “witness,” and then attesting that both clients had appeared before him to sign.

Not suspended.

Not disbarred.

Reprimanded.


In giving the attorney what amounts to a slap on the wrist for a text-book example of attorney dishonesty implicating trustworthiness, the Court said it considered as mitigating factors…

“…respondent’s admission of wrongdoing; his acceptance of responsibility for his actions; his expression of sincere contrition and genuine remorse; his apology to Malzone and Hibberd; his “serious health problems” at the time
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Fri Mar 30, 2012 12:00 am

Every cocaine kingpin needs an angel with a bar card

New York criminal defense attorney Robert Simels (pictured), 62, was convicted of multiple counts of witness-tampering, bribery, and illegal possession of eavesdropping equipment. The charges stemmed from a plot to "eliminate" and "neutralize" federal witnesses slated to testify against one of his clients. Simels was convicted of tampering with eight witnesses set to testify against Shaheed (Roger) Khan, a major cocaine trafficker from Guyana
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Sat May 05, 2012 10:08 am

SCUMBAG LAWYER STOLE FROM ELDERLY PENSIONER

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1cq_8zCUzo
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Sun May 20, 2012 3:16 pm

Who has an explanation for the disconnect between reality and the excerpt below; standard BS regarding qualities lawyers should strive to achieve.

A lawyer should develop and maintain the qualities of integrity, compassion, learning, civility, diligence and public service that mark the most admired members of our profession. A lawyer should provide an example to the community in these qualities and should not be satisfied with minimal compliance with the mandatory rules governing professional conduct. These qualities apply both to office practice and to litigation. A lawyer should be mindful of the need to protect the standing of the legal profession in the view of the public and should bring these Principles to the attention of other lawyers when appropriate.

1. Integrity. Personal integrity is the most important quality in a lawyer. A lawyer's integrity requires personal conduct that does not impair the rendering of professional service of the highest skill and ability; acting with candor; preserving confidences; treating others with respect; and acting with conviction and courage in advocating a lawful cause. Candor requires both the expression of the truth and the refusal to mislead others in speech and demeanor.


40 percent of the public rank lawyers low or very low in honesty and ethical standards

Car salesman are distrusted by 50 percent. Are lawyers troubled by mere 10 percent difference?


Image
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:45 pm

It is refreshing to realize there are some lawyers who actually understand their value to society.


Sycamore attorney pleads guilty to prostitution charge

Image



Last year this same individual was waving the not guilty flag........

Reema has pleaded not guilty and issued a statement on her website before it was taken down: "I am probably one of the few attorneys who knows what it feels like to be accused and in need of help. This action will only make me stronger and better able to understand what my clients are going through."



http://abovethelaw.com/2012/06/reema-ba ... -friend/3/
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are reprehensible S C U

Postby judd » Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:01 pm

Welcome to the immoral world of the typical lawyer. 20 years is appropriate for these deviants. It will be interesting to follow this case to determine if and when these professionals are disbarred.

A Law Firm Partner and His Boalt Hall Wife Stand Accused of Planting Drugs on an Elementary School Volunteer


Image

Isn't it amusing how many of these masterminds exhibit the IQ of a common criminal............

Irvine detectives investigated the possibility that someone planted the drugs in the woman’s car and discovered that the call that alerted them was placed by Kent Easter from a phone in a business center of a Newport Beach hotel, according to prosecutors.

The hotel’s surveillance cameras captured images of him at the time the call was placed, prosecutors said.



http://abovethelaw.com/2012/06/a-law-firm-partner-and-his-boalt-hall-wife-stand-accused-of-planting-drugs-on-an-elementary-school-volunteer/
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

Re: Historical Perspective - Lawyers are repulsive S C U M

Postby judd » Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:22 am

UPDATE ON THE MINDLESS HELICOPTOR PARENTS. EVERY DEFENDANT SHOULD ATTEMPT THIS ABSURD RUSE.


The arraignment of Kent Wycliffe Easter and Jillianne Bjorkholm Easter, who are accused of planting drugs in a school volunteer's car, was delayed today because of a "healthcare emergency" that left the husband "unable to speak," according to his lawyer.

Orange County Superior Court Judge Walter Schwarm in Santa Ana postponed the arraignment for another month.


Each could get three years in prison if convicted of trying to pull of a bizarre plot the afternoon of Feb. 16, 2011, to discredit a Plaza Vista School volunteer who had mildly disciplined their son a year earlier. The Easters later tried unsuccessfully to sue Kelli Peters in 2010 over the incident.


Peters is now returning the favor, suing the Easters for allegedly bringing fear, panic and anxiety to her and her family with the drug plant. Her suit seeks unspecified damages "for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress and false imprisonment."
judd
 
Posts: 187
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:03 am

PreviousNext

Return to LawyerRatingz Main Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests